Rory McIlroy has said he will not play in the Olympics, citing dreads over the Zika virus, and it raises questions over whether the sport should be part of the Games in future
Rory McIlroy had a potential out from golfs Olympic return from the moment that landmark decision was voted through in 2009. The delicacy of a Northern Irish sportsman , not least one as high-profile as McIlroy, having to declare for an Irish or British Olympic team entailed the option of passing up the 2016 Games solely was initially a live prospect.
Instead, McIlroy proclaimed two years ago this month that he would represent Ireland. The four-time major winners sentiment then is worth reflecting on, after his statement on Wednesday morning that he will not travel to Rio after all due to health dreads over the Zika virus. Just as McIlroy is not prone to shirking decisions, he is clearly capable of a consequential change of heart.
It would have been an easy way out for me[ not to play] but I thought about the good of golf, McIlroy said in 2014. This is the first time golf has been in the Olympics for a long time and if the best players arent there, supporting the event and competing in it, then whats the point? I feel like I have a responsibility to grow video games, as part of a group of players who can spread this game throughout the world.
The accusations in some quarters now will be that McIlroy never had any interest in the Olympics. If so, why go to the hassle of making a tricky personal decision before offering an endorsement as above? Why wait until now to pull out? It would be a rather convoluted, needless way of dodging something. Adam Scott was an Olympic objector from the start and made no secret of it; McIlroys situation has clearly been different.
For starters, he rightly regards himself as an athlete. The opportunity to mingle with others held appeal. Does McIlroy absence is committed to Ireland? Not if the total rejuvenation of the Irish Open, with McIlroy taking the result, is anything to go by. His home open looks like being a real professional legacy.
This decision not to play in Brazil would have been especially troublesome for McIlroy on two fronts. Paul McGinley, Irelands golf team leader for the Olympics, is held in huge esteem by the 27 -year-old. The notion of disappointing McGinley wouldnt sit well with McIlroy, who retains more of a conscience than many others at the pinnacle of sport. Paul is a very close friend of mine and if I didnt play Id let him down big time, McIlroy said only last month.
The second point relates to that broader golf issue to which McIlroy himself referred. McIlroy is a standard bearer and poster boy for his sport. He takes that responsibility severely. McIlroys absence from the Olympics unquestionably harms the scene, a matter rendered even more acute by the uncertainty surrounding golfs participation beyond 2020.
McIlroy, Jason Day and Jordan Spieth have played such a huge part in taking golf into a post-Tiger Woods era. With that comes a wider responsibility and implication for every action. It seemed certain in 2009 that the Olympics partly wanted golf to capitalise on the Tiger factor. The baton has passed on, with McIlroy in the vanguard.
McIlroys move touches on the very issue of whether or not golf should be part of the Olympic equation. He has been criticised already by a boxer and a pentathlete, for whom the Olympics are a holy grail. Blatantly, golfers will never have the same lifelong ambition or attachment. This means, following logic, they will be less inclined to place themselves in any health or security danger; the latter has been raised constantly in golfing circles with the same regularity as Zika. Golfers can and will move on to the next tournament, including majors which will always be held in far loftier esteem than the Olympics. That status gap may change over day but there is no indication of that for now.
Golf and Rio have been entwined in a routine public-relations catastrophe. This started with epic wrangling over the construction of the venue itself and has now led to a batch of players the number is certain to increase guessing better of attending. At the Players Championship last month two professionals, Graham DeLaet and Caroline Masson, were placed on a podium and asked to chat through all that was good about Olympic golf. This was stunted, desperate stuff; the narrative had long since sway in an alternate direction. I think we are on a good track, Tim Finchem, the PGA Tours chief executive, said. With a straight face, as well.
On Wednesday, as news of McIlroys decision transgressed, the International Golf Federation issued its latest bland statement citing an unfortunate scenario. That body, which is overseeing golfs Games participation for the first time since 1904, has failed horribly in its remit either to persuade players that Rio will be perfectly safe or to create viable alternative plans. Discord hasnt made the IGF all of a sudden yet their answer has proved lamentable. Even the lack of available information indicated by McIlroy, Danny Willett, Rickie Fowler and others doesnt appear wholly clever.
McIlroy will receive flak before carrying on with his career. He has done likewise before, after all. His issue rather touches on a pivotal, wider point: the validity of Olympic golf. Without marquee names, an already flimsy case for inclusion is weakened further.
Read more: www.theguardian.com