That the USGA is acutely well informed Phil Mickelsons lauded status in the eyes of the public is highly significant in context of the tawdry events at Shinnecock Hills
Perhaps New York golf fans are not a particularly valid barometer. A day after players- most notably Ian Poulter- were verbally abused when running about their US Open business, Phil Mickelson stood with limbs aloft having holed out for par on the 13 th green. The masses roared with delight.” You’re the man, Phil .” Well, quite. The rest of us rolled our eyes.
That the United States Golf Association is acutely aware of Mickelson’s lauded status in the eyes of the public is highly significant in context of the tawdry events of Saturday. The USGA, opposing an apparently losing battle to win over hearts and minds, could not very well disqualify a golfing sweetheart from the only major he has not yet won. On his birthday? Immediately before Father’s Day? No opportunity. We will never know how the USGA would have reacted had Brian Harman or Sam Burns behaved in the same manner as Mickelson.
Mickelson’s antics on the 13 th on Sunday, the scene of his deliberate breaching of golf’s rules on Saturday, indicated no lesson has been learned. That is the only available conclusion dedicated he refused to conduct post-round interviews having apparently autographed every available item of golf merchandise in New York state.
Contrary to occasional interpretation, Mickelson did not use or bend those rules to his advantage. He broke them. Even more galling was the post-round affirm after a sharp jog towards a woeful putt was entirely on purpose. That Mickelson is considered in certain quarters as an unlikely rogue does not at all excuse his petulance.
Mickelson had called Mike Davis, the USGA’s chief executive, on Saturday to apparently double check he should not have been disqualified. This is curious, dedicated Mickelson had constructed such a phase of being perfectly versed in what the rules say. Davis- who should carry a business card stating” In event of emergency, call a press conference”- is not merely had to justify leniency after round three ended, he issued a statement on Sunday morning.” There appears to be some continued uncertainty …” started this bulletin. On the contrary; people are certainly angry.
John Bodenhamer, the USGA’s rules guru, brushed aside the notion that disqualification should have been implemented under regulation 33 -7. “It’s used in extreme circumstances,” he said. If this was not an extreme circumstance, of a player wilfully transgressing golf law before boasting about it, it is unclear what precisely is.
If golf takes a dim view of those who take the moral low ground, it is appropriate to make no apology for that. Mickelson’s behaviour stood out because it was so brazen. Butter has not melted in his mouth in the past. Four years ago, he did not so much stab Tom Watson in the back as issue a withering critique of the USA’s Ryder Cup captain at Gleneagles as the veteran sat five seats away. It was duly put to Mickelson that he had” savagely destructed” Watson in front of the watching world. His response?” Oh, I’m sorry you are taking it that way .” Having the courage of his sentences, after all, might have damaged Mickelson’s halo.
The same applies here. Had Mickelson claimed his act was borne out of frustration on what was a brutal US Open day, he would have been afforded understand. Had he claimed this represented a protest at the golf course setup as implemented by the USGA, Mickelson would have been in tune with his fellow challengers. Instead, the five-time major champ was at his supercilious worst.
One legitimate explanation for Mickelson’s dive into controversial water is that he realises a career grand slam is an unattainable dream. With every happen year- and Shinnecock appealed to Mickelson more than most US Open venues- the chances of him winning this prestigious event recede. He has now reached 48, the age identical to that of Julius Boros when he became the oldest major win in history. That was in 1968.
Mickelson’s fourth round of 69 mean an aggregate of 16 -over par. Rickie Fowler, his playing partner, said here 13 th on Saturday was an instant topic of conversation. Fowler, it must be noted, is not prone to critical sentiment towards anyone.
” He joked about it right as we went down the 1st hole ,” Fowler said.” So we had a good time. And then he made a good par save on 13 and it looked like he won the Master. He didn’t leap, but he had a little gala there.
” Obviously, Phil’s great at enjoying playing golf, having fun out there, interacting with the fans. I feel like we both had a good time out there just enjoying a fun round of golf. We both had it going. Regrettably Phil didn’t finish it off the way he wanted to .”
Mickelson’s exit was at great pace; an unedifying episode which instead summed up his week.
Read more: www.theguardian.com